I still get a huge laugh out of having a long and random post titles that don't really mean anything.

You know, when I started this blog, I had grand expectations. I wanted to have a large number of people following me daily, reading all of my words, and then sharing their comments on my grand and fascinating life.

For some reason (even though I am pretty awesome), that never happened. Perhaps my sheer verbosity was so encumbering that people simply could not participate in a way that ameliorated the conversation or in a way that would not seem completely extraneous.

Yeah, I was just throwing out some old vocab words I remembered from school. They all fit, but it doesn't really mean anything.

Anyway. Nobody ever really commented. And I think I know why. I often shared some of my opinions, but mostly, I stuck to being chronological. I didn't share tons of insight into what I was thinking or learning. Just what I was doing. Ok, well, I'd also argue that I shared a lot of my thoughts through the sarcasm and jokes and humor, but still. We all know you skipped over the middle parts of my writing anyway. And I know a few people searched for their names and only read those parts. I know. I know.

I read a lot of blogs. I comment on a lot of them. For a while, I did this so that they'd also comment on my blog. This was a tactic I learned from the days of having "guestbooks" on websites. Yeah... If you had a website in 1996, you know what I'm talking about. That tactic doesn't really apply anymore. Most people simply want to read anonymously and if they do want to share a comment, it's either in a discussion-type forum or they only want to share when there is something to contribute to.

And, after all, let's think about that. Who wants to contribute when all I ever wrote about is what I did during the day? "Uh, yeah, Joe, I agree... you work a lot... thanks for reminding us...".

I had a conversation last weekend about this with my friend Catie. She recently started a blog. Reading how she expressed thoughts and ideas and concepts immediately put me back in my mindset of fear that stopped me from blogging when I first started this whole thing back in 2005. (For those that have been following the story... you know about that, for those that haven't, well, it was called, "A blog of how your life COULD be", and it was a pretty awesome blog). I used to write my opinions on that blog and thought nothing of it. However, whenever my writing caused conflict, my first tendency was to either delete the offending text, or to completely ignore that person that was offended by my writing. Because, let's be honest, either what I wrote they misinterpreted, or, what I wrote they misinterpreted, right?

I have always hated conflict. I'm a pretty peaceful person, and somewhere along the way, I just assumed that I'd never be capable of writing something that would offend somebody else. As I kept that old blog, I finally decided that I just didn't have a good handle on my emotions (or, at least, expressing them online). I wasn't comfortable with putting my thoughts and expressions out there for people to read and possibly criticize/discuss.

I think that caused me, to a degree, to want to avoid any real deep expression of opinion on this blog. I did it from time to time, but I always forced myself to keep the mindset of, "Would I take this and go read it to every single person I know or might know and not offend them?" That can make for some pretty boring reading. So, I stuck to the chronological thing. It worked.

And the thing is, I like the chronological style of writing. Over time, I started to feel pressure from the people following me ("reading often or daily"), to fully inform them of my days and actions, for the sake of making the story that much more complete. I have often felt like if I could devote all day to writing, that I would and easily could. My mind is so active that it's easy for me to sit and write out everything I've done in the last day, week, or month. I suppose that's a good thing and a bad thing. I still don't know why I'm so good with dates.

I think people are looking for more than chronological writing. And a side of me wants to contribute in that way, revealing more of my thoughts. It's a style of writing I've always enjoyed, and it will be new and refreshing challenge for me to consider how that might look.

So what does that mean? I don't know. As much as I would enjoy returning to a daily posting habit of writing about my days, I don't think it's for the best. I have found a certain freedom that I have come to enjoy about not having to write about every little thing. It has nothing to do with not wanting accountability, but rather, sometimes I just didn't have the energy to fully articulate how I felt about a particular part of my day. And I hated doing anything half-heartedly.

I have no immediate plans to disable this blog. However, at this time in my life, I want to focus on a different style of writing, and this doesn't suit it.

Now, feel free to comment on THAT... or not.

Later,

Joe

10 comments

  • miller10408  
    April 15, 2009 7:41 AM

    Yeah, Joe, I agree....you work a lot.....

    oh wait, that's not what we're talking about though, is it? I do think it would be wonderful to read a blog of your feelings/emotions about your life and the things in it. You cant worry about offending ppl, b/c no matter what, you're never going to please everyone at the same time. Everybody has opinions (we all know your sister is quite opinionated...) and you have every right to voice yours. Your blog is just that - YOURS. I say whatever I want on my blog and if ppl don't like it, they don't have to read it. If they're offended by something, that's too bad. I dont say things to purposefully offend ppl, but my blog is about my feelings/opinions/thoughts and I'm not going to sugar-coat it just b/c somebody might not agree.

    Agree? =)

  • Paul Tedder  
    April 15, 2009 9:35 AM

    I appreciate your post because it is good to read some of your struggles with your blog. There are all sorts of reasons to have a blog and trying to figure out "if" and "why" has been a challenging thing for me too.

    It will be interesting to see what's next for you.

  • Joe  
    April 15, 2009 10:43 AM

    Thanks for the comments. Gina, I respectfully disagree--while my blog can be a place to post my opinions, I still think that I have to be somewhat cautious as to how others will perceive that. We are called to love each other as Christ loved us, and I don't want to create a blog or environment where "you're either with me or against me".

    I agree that sugar-coating everything makes the overall point seem diluted, but I think that if I had something I wanted to express in that way, it either simply should not go online, or at least not be public (password-protected blogs are nice).

    I'm not saying there isn't a time and a place for expressing opinions of that nature, but perhaps public consumption by anonymous readers is not the best format for that.

  • BBC  
    April 15, 2009 12:22 PM

    Well, I don't search for my name in your blogs, because you don't know me! ;-) (But I do search for "whatnot," which I didn't find at ALL in this blog! *sniff* )

    I'm a fan of chronological blogs. I'm part of a private circle of Christian moms who mostly blog about our days, sometimes ranting, sometimes tackling controversial subjects (which usually results in one or two people getting ticked off and deleting their friends and/or blog), but usually uplifting and encouraging each other. My blog in blogspot is a lot less personal because strangers might read it! And it's geared somewhat to homeschooling, although I veer from that topic from time to time.

    I enjoy reading your blogs because I know you from church, where you seem so stoic, yet in your writing you are such a comedian. People are complex individuals, and your blog is proof of that. I like it! Don't stop!

  • Rex  
    April 15, 2009 3:53 PM

    To me Twitter seems to be much more appropriate for chronological "happenings" in your day-to-day life. It's more passively informative, which is easier both on you as the writer and on your audience; and it's burstable, so interesting days get plenty of activity and boring days get none.

    Whichever medium(s) you use, I continue to look forward to engaging you on it.

  • Joe  
    April 15, 2009 4:38 PM

    Brenda, I would say that I know OF you... I recognize you at church. We're what you would consider "online friends" instead of offline friends or whatnot.

    While I enjoy the storytelling aspect that a chronological blog yields, I think that after spending a year doing it every day, I want to spend some energy and focus on a different style of writing. You know, because I mastered this one and all.

    Do you really think I'm stoic in person? Maybe you're thinking of my twin brother Tim... nah, you're probably right. I tend to have some stoic-ness... or ... stoic-icity... stoic-ifishness... something.

  • Brenda (BBC)  
    April 15, 2009 5:44 PM

    "Whatnot." *giggle*

    Maybe I should have said serious. You seem serious and quiet. Seriously quiet. Sneaking around on the catwalk and all ... ;-)

  • Joe  
    April 15, 2009 9:20 PM

    It's because I happen to be a professional ninja. It's in my job description.

  • Anonymous  
    April 20, 2009 6:52 PM

    Hi Joe!

    I'm glad you posted your thoughts on our conversation - I've been thinking a lot about it, too!

    Your (and Rex's!) caution to me about posting things that could backfire (read: get me in trouble with important people that would otherwise be in the dark that they piss me off except that I blogged about it) has made me think about the types of things one can blog about.

    It seems as though your thoughts on this are "either/or" - either you blog chronologically, or you blog in such a way that people can be offended by you.

    Hopefully, even though I've only posted 3 things (and one didn't count, since it was an intro) on my blog, you can look at it an see that it doesn't exactly fit into your "either/or" dichotomy.

    I may eventually blog-ponder things that are controversial, but I've so far stuck to things that are important to me without necessarily engaging anyone else in my thoughts. I vented about a situation once, but recanted and deleted the post shortly thereafter.

    The significance of this is that I've avoided highly emotional situations as fodder for blog posts. When I get pissed off, I don't blog about it. I go running or vent to Rex in person or something.

    Maybe you should consider first doing what you love - if you love chronologically detailing your day, then do it! If you're also interested in being more personal or real in your blog, maybe you could make a list of topics that you want to write about and then start writing - if its something you think can be published safely (ie not too emotional)then do so. If you don't feel comfortable putting it on your blog, you could just save it into a folder on your laptop, and feel great that you've written your thoughts out in a diary-type format. As an alternative, if you want to share your thoughts with select people so as to engage in a dialog about your topic, you can always email it to whomever (coughmeandrexcough) you trust to not get offended!


    Hopefully you get a huge laugh out of having long and random comments to your posts that don't have a cohesive message, too...


    ~Catie

  • Joe  
    April 20, 2009 8:26 PM

    Thanks for contributing Catie--some good thoughts. I definitely feel like blogs can be a place to express opinion (even if those opinions feel "controversial")... I just have to continually caution myself that blogging is not appropriate for expressing my opinions of OTHER PEOPLE.

    First of all, it never gives that person the opportunity to represent themselves, especially when they may not even know if you are talking about them to other people in this way.

    I failed at this many times, I am sure! I think it was tied to your point about emotional posting. There is some merit to writing from our emotions--but I think it's the sign of a good writer who can put emotion into their writing without focusing entirely on the "other person"'s faults, etc.

    Anytime I read another person's blog who continually complains about other people in their writing, one of two things occurs. (1) I also begin to think badly about that other person--who I may or may not have met; (b) I begin to think that the person writing is never in a good mood and just likes to complain.

    I want neither of those to be a focal point in my writing. I want writing to be an avenue for me to express creative ideas, things I am learning, and experiences I have been through that have grown me in some way.

    I want to write. I want to write long posts. I want to write long posts that are worth reading and that people might want to contribute to. I thought it might happen if I wrote about my life.

    I found that not many people really read an entry in its' entirety on this blog. I got tired of spending so much time each day writing something publicly, editing it for "public consumption", finishing it before going to bed each night, only to have what was presumably such a small number of people read it.

    Now I'm focusing on a different avenue of thought that goes around inside my head--technical ministry and leadership. And creativeness. And burritos. They're all possibilities. The point is--no one entry is a "This has to be finished by the end of the day" type of entry. I can spend as much time or as little time as I feel is necessary to complete an entry. If no one reads it, it's ok. I'm still proud of it.

    That's it. If people feel compelled to comment, that's cool. If not, that's cool too.

    And yeah, I totally do the private journaling on my computer thing to vent to myself. And I vent to Rex all the time, just ask him.

    So, ye...yeh?

    I never thought I'd be on a boat.

Post a Comment